Legal Opinion
Collins v. Bowles
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided January 10, 1946No. 231PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Judge.
Respondent brought suit against complainants to recover damages for sales of whiskey above established ceiling prices. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 204(e) (1) of the Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appeudix § 924(e) (1), complainants procured leave in the District Court to apply to this court for adjudication of the validity of the regulations involved.
Complainants were stockholders in an incorporated distillery dissolved December 31, 1942. As a result of such dissolution, they received certain warehouse receipts for bulk whiskey stored in bonded warehouses, which they…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Brown v. Cummins Distilleries CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1944
- Taub v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
- Alan Levin Foundation v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
- Barnett v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
3Cited by14 opinions
- Conklin Pen Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Collins v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gordon v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- In re RiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Fast v. Di Salle, Director of Price StabilizationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.