Van Der Loo v. Porter
Emergency Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LAWS, Judge.
This suit is brought by a retailer of feminine apparel, who complains that the Administrator has not correctly interpreted Revised Maximum Price Regulation 330, establishing Retailers’ and Wholesalers’ Prices for Women’s, Girls’, Children’s and Toddlers’ Outerwear Garments 1 — as it applies to her and, alternatively, that if the Administrator’s interpretation is correct, the Regulation is invalid.
The Regulation established as maximum prices which might be charged for feminine outerwear at wholesale and retail those prices at which each individual seller made the largest number of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conklin Pen Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Hillcrest Terrace Corporation v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Consolidated Water Power & Paper Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
- Collins v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- Superior Packing Co. v. ClarkEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
- Standard Oil Co. v. Federal Energy AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
- Fleming v. Van Der LooCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Counselman v. FlemingEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.