Legal Opinion
Walker v. Thornsberry
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1979No. Civ. 17824PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVANS, J.
Defendant Thornsberry appeals from an adverse $9,447.96 judgment. We affirm.
Plaintiff is the assignee for collection of an account receivable of Super Secur Comfort Stations (Super Secur), a division of Aluminum Plumbing Fixture Corporation. Super Secur is a manufacturer of metal prefabricat*844ed restrooms, one of which was sold to defendant, a general contractor, for installation at the Berenda Reservoir Launching Facilities. Super Secur, not licensed as a contractor, agreed to furnish, assemble, and install the unit upon a concrete foundation prepared by defendant or his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Rushing v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Davis Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Johnson v. MattoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Jackson v. PancakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- BANIS RESTAURANT DESIGN, INC. v. SerranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Industrial Power & Lighting Corp. v. Western Modular Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Fillmore v. IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Alaska Protection Services, Inc. v. Frontier Colorcable, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. Custom Craft Carpets, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.