Legal Opinion

Fillmore v. Irvine

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1983No. Civ. 21880PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Defendants Fleet Irvine, Douglas Tanner, Thomas Tarman and Gene McFarren appeal from a judgment entered May 5, 1982, after court trial in favor of plaintiff Terrence L. Fillmore. Plaintiff sued defendants to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and for breach of oral contract arising from his failure to be paid for services as a drywall finisher. Defendants contend that: (1) the trial court erroneously applied Labor Code section 2750.5’s rebuttable presumption that plaintiff was an employee rather than an unlicensed independent contractor barred by statute from recovery; (2) absent the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Department of Social Services v. Ronald P.California Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Neighbours v. Buzz Oates EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kizer v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Woolley v. Embassy Suites, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. McKeon v. Hastings College of the LawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API