Johnson v. Mattox
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
Appellants brought this action against the respondents to recover the sum of $7,975 due them for services rendered and materials furnished in the preparation of the grounds of respondents ’ ‘ ‘ California Baseball School. ’ ’ During cross-examination of appellants’ first witness, the court granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the action on the ground that appellants were barred from recovering because none of them were licensed as contractors. (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 7026-7059.)
The evidence introduced before the dismissal established the following facts: Respondents asked appellants to help…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Bowline v. GriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Galich v. BrkichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Viking Pools, Inc. v. MaloneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Ahdout v. HekmatjahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Executive Landscape Corp. v. San Vicente Country Villas IV Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Ranchwood Communities Limited Partnership v. Jim Beat Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Pacific Custom Pools, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.