Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Pancake

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1968No. Civ. 11680PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

Plaintiff (Jackson) sued and recovered judgment after a court trial against defendants (the Pancakes) on actions under common counts for the reasonable yalue of labor and materials. Judgment was for $901.89. Jackson was not a licensed contractor during the performance of any of the work for which he sued.

The broad question on appeal is whether the action is barred under Business and Professions Code section 7031. The narrower question is whether the court correctly determined that plaintiff was an employee (§7053) and furnished materials incidentally as a materialman (§7052) and not a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Borello v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Phillips v. McIntoshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Kirman v. BorzageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Holland v. MORSE DIESEL INTERNAT., INC.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Associated Independent Owner-Operators, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. General Insurance of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Dahl-Beck Electric Co. v. RoggeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API