United States ex rel. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
The fact situation out of which this case arises is essentially the same as that described in United States ex rel. Chicago Great Western R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm., 294 U.S. 50, 55 S.Ct. 326, 79 L.Ed. 752. Appellant, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, appeared as an intervener in the proceeding before the Interstate Commerce Commission in the earlier case. In the present case it appeared by original complaint before the Commission. In each of the two cases, the objective sought was to escape the burdens imposed upon it by an agreement — into which it…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Ex Parte RowlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States Ex Rel. McLennan v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States Ex Rel. International Contracting Co. v. LamontSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mallory Coal Co. v. National Bituminous Coal CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Utah Fuel Co. v. National Bituminous Coal CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- United States Ex Rel. United States Borax Co. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Brunswick v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Iowa City-Montezuma Railroad Shippers Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.