Legal Opinion
Mallory Coal Co. v. National Bituminous Coal Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 1, 1938No. 7178PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
Petitioners are corporations engaged in the production, sale and shipment of bituminous coal in interstate commerce, and are members in good standing of the Bituminous Coal Code, promulgated by respondent, under the provisions of the Bituminous Coal Act of 1937. 1
By its order, dated July 15, 1937, pursuant to authority given by Section 10 of the Bituminous .Coal Act of 1937, 50 Stat. 88, 15 U.S.C.A. § 840, 2 the Commission required:
“1. That each producer of bituminous coal, whether or not a code member and whether or not engaged in commerce in coal which is subject…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- In Re ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. BirdsallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Utah Fuel Co. v. National Bituminous Coal Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hammond v. HullCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Spanish International Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission, International Panorama Tv, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Boucher v. Division of Employment Security of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.