Ross v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDbNNY, J.
Tbe defendant assigns as error tbe refusal of bis Honor to grant its motion for judgment as of nonsuit lodged at tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence and renewed at tbe close of all tbe evidence.
On a motion to nonsuit, tbe evidence is to be taken in tbe light most favorable to tbe plaintiff, and be is entitled to tbe benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. C. S. 567. Wingler v. Miller, ante, 15; Edwards v. Junior Order, 220 N. C., 41, 16 S. E. (2d), 466; Coltram v. R. R., 216 N. C., 263, 4 S. E. (2d), 852; Lincoln v. R. R., 207 N. C., 787, 178 S. E. (2d), 601; Dickerson v.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Burt v. Advertiser Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Harton v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hinnant v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Pascal Ex Rel. Pascal v. Burke Transit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Williams v. MickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Maddox v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Tyndall v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.