Hinnant v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogden, J.
What are tbe tests established by law in determining wben tbe negligence of tbe driver of an automobile “is tbe sole, proxi mate cause” of an injury to a passenger therein resulting from the collision between the automobile and a train at a grade crossing?
This Court has held with unbroken uniformity that the negligence of the driver of an automobile is not ordinarily imputed to a passenger who neither owns the car nor has any control of the car or driver, and who is not engaged in a joint enterprise with the driver at the time of his injury. Nevertheless, if the negligence of the driver is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harton v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Taylor v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Herman v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Lineberry Ex Rel. Lineberry v. North Carolina Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.