Legal Opinion
Rouse v. Law Offices of Rory Clark
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 25, 2006No. 06cv0006-LAB (RBB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ SPECIAL ANTI-SLAPP MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND, THIRD, FIFTH, AND SIXTH CAUSES OF ACTION
BURNS, District Judge.
This Fair Debt Collection Practices matter is before the court on the Special Mo tion To Strike by defendants Law Offices of Rory Clark, Rory Clark, and Jan Shapiro (collectively the “Clark Defendants”) (Dkt No. 5) and the separate Motion To Strike by defendant Worldwide Asset Purchasing (“Worldwide”) (Dkt No. 10). Both motions rely on the California anti-SLAPP statute, Cal.Code Civ. P. § 425.16, and each contends four of the six causes of action alleged in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Komarova v. National Credit Acceptance, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Welker v. Law Office of HorwitzDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2009
- Ray Charles Foundation v. RobinsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- O'Neil-Rosales v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2017
- Gross v. Judge CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.