Legal Opinion
O'Neil-Rosales v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided March 7, 2017No. BV 031488PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LEE, J.*
—Plaintiff and appellant Peggy O’Neil-Rosales appeals the judgment entered against her and in favor of defendants and respondents Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. and Hunt & Henriques. Plaintiff contends the trial court erroneously granted defendants’ special motions to strike the complaint under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (the “anti-SLAPP” statute).1 We affirm the judgment.
*Supp. 4 BACKGROUND
On August 13, 2014, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants, asserting causes of action for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) (15 U.S.C. § 1692 et…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Howard Contracting, Inc. v. G.A. MacDonald Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Torliatt v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021