Legal Opinion
McNeill v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 13, 1998No. 87119PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice.
¶ 1 City of Tulsa and its Retirement Plan seek our review of the trial court’s certified interlocutory order finding that 72 O.S.1991 § 67.13a, which grants war veterans a military service credit toward their retirement benefits, applies to Tulsa’s Plan for its employees. We find that it does not and reverse the trial court.
¶ 2 We granted certiorari to address questions regarding the proper construction of § 67.13a and to determine the section’s reach. The relevant portion of the statute, with the amendatory language at issue in italics, provides:
“ * * * War veterans, as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen v. State Ex Rel. Board of Trustees of the Oklahoma Uniform Retirement System for Justices & JudgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Cave Springs Public School District I-30 v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Rucker v. TappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Abbott v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF OSCAR ROSE, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Edmondson v. PearceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Glasco v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- State ex rel. Oklahoma State Department of Health v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- World Publishing Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.