MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. MACKEY
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
REIF, J.:
¶ 1 This case concerns the meaning and effect of a proviso in 85 O.S.2011, 402(A)(4).1 The general subject of 402(A) is the definition of physically impaired person for purposes of recovery from the Multiple Injury Trust Fund (MITF). Subsection 402(A)(4) provides that an injured worker with “[a]ny previous adjudications of disability adjudged and determined by the Workers’ Compensation Court” qualifies as a physically impaired person. The proviso in 402(A)(4), further addresses the narrower subject of cases where the claimant’s preexisting disability and'last-injury disability are in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- J. C. Penney Co. v. CrumbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- BALL v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Special Indemnity Fund v. DoughtySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Special Indemnity Fund v. BettertonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
3Cited by9 opinions
- MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. WIGGINSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- McKESSON CORP. v. CAMPBELLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- McKESSON CORP. v. CAMPBELLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. MACKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. MACKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.