Legal Opinion

Victora v. Village of Muscoda

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed May 17, 1938:

Fairchild, J.

Certain taxpayers of the village of Mus-coda complain that the village officers have attempted to enter into a contract for the purchase of a Diesel-engine gen-*457eratmg plant without complying with the provisions of sec. 61.55, Stats., which provides:

“All contracts for the performance of any work or the purchase of any materials, in any such village, exceeding five hundred dollars, shall be let by the village board to the lowest bidder in such manner as they may prescribe.”

For several years the village had been engaged in the power…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Kilvington v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Mueller v. Eau Claire CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Attorney General ex rel. Allis-Chalmers Co. v. Public Lighting CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aqua-Tech, Inc. v. Como Lake Protection & Rehabilitation DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Democrat Printing Co. v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Roberts v. MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Barnard v. County of KandiyohiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Bechthold v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API