Legal Opinion

Aqua-Tech, Inc. v. Como Lake Protection & Rehabilitation District

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1976No. 75-309PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The defendant district was organized under the provisions of ch. 33, Stats., which authorizes the creation of Lake Protection Districts for the purpose of undertaking programs of lake protection and rehabilitation. In May of 1975, the district circulated an invitation for sealed bids to conduct the Como Lake Feasibility Study. The bid specifications included the following condition: “Financial status and professional qualifications of Bidder will be carefully considered. Como Lake District reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularities, or to accept any bid which in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Menzl v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State ex rel. Phelan v. Board of EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Mueller v. Eau Claire CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Flottum v. City of CumberlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Horsfield Materials, Inc. v. City of DyersvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. J.F. Ahern Co. v. Wisconsin State Building CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  4. Wisconsin Ass'n of Food Dealers v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Prn Associates LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of AdministrationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API