Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barnard v. County of Kandiyohi

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 31, 1942No. 33,132Published

1DissentStone, Justice

Were I able to agree that decision should be upon procedural grounds, I could easily concur in the result. But record and argument have given us all the material needed for decision on the merits. My opinion is that decision should go accordingly.

The opinion gives the assignments of error all the functions of a pleading in a new case. Thereby is again illustrated how an ancient and outmoded concept may improperly control judicial action. This method of decision throws back to the ancient days when a writ of error was considered in the nature of a bill of complaint against the trial court.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Baird v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Shaw v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Matter of Petition of Anthony DugroNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Hobart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Burns v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API