Legal Opinion

Bechthold v. City of Wauwatosa

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1938Published

1Opinion

On rehearing:

Roy R. Stauff of Milwaukee, for the respondents city of Wauwatosa and Fred Prudisch. For the respondent Federal Paving Corporation there were briefs by Bender, Trump & McIntyre of Milwaukee, attorneys, and E. L. McIntyre of Milwaukee and Roberts, Roe & Boardman of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. McIntyre and Mr. W. Wade Boardman. A brief was also filed by Lyel N. Jenkins, city attorney of Stevens Point, as amicus curies.

The following opinion was filed June 21, 1938:

2Per curiam

(on rehearing). A motion for rehearing was granted in this case and the matter has been reargued and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Frederick v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Harlem Gas Co. v. . Mayor, C., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. Dean v. CharltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Ricketson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API