Castro v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
In this case we must decide whether a party moving to expunge an improperly recorded lis pendens is entitled to attorney fees as a “prevailing party” under Code of Civil Procedure section 405.38 1 when the lis pendens is withdrawn before a ruling on the motion. We conclude that the withdrawal of a lis pendens while a motion to expunge is pending does not automatically preclude recovery of attorney fees to the moving party. Rather, we adopt a practical approach to determine the prevailing party based on the trial court’s determination of which party realized its objectives in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- International Industries, Inc. v. OlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Carver v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. FalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Wohlgemuth v. Caterpillar Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Villa De Las Palmas Homeowners Ass'n v. TerifajCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Bock v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Aleman v. Airtouch CellularCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.