Scholle v. Finnell
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County and from an order refusing a new trial. John E. Ellison, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is an appeal from portions of a judg ment in favor of the defendant Simpson Pinnell and from an order denying a new trial as to certain issues found in his favor.
The complaint alleged that one John Pinnell between 1893 and the time of his death in October, 1905, was indebted to plaintiff in a sum amounting to $62,178; that during this whole period said John Pinnell was insolvent; that in the year 1895 said John Pinnell conceived a plan, purpose, and design of defrauding his creditors, particularly plaintiff, and pursuant thereto while insolvent and in contemplation of insolvency and with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Albertoli v. BranhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Roberts v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Bush & Mallett Co. v. HelbingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by12 opinions
- Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- McGee v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Moss Estate Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Betzer v. OlneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.