Legal Opinion

Sickles v. Jackson County Highway Department

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 2011No. 11CA7PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} The Sickles family filed suit against Jackson County and Thomas Keaton, alleging that Keaton, a county employee, had negligently and recklessly operated a salt truck, causing them personal and derivative injuries. The defendants now appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment.

{¶ 2} Appellants contend that the Jackson County Highway Department is not a proper party, because the department does not have the capacity to sue or be sued. However, the trial court’s decision to deny the department summary judgment based on this argument did not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. Haven Place, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Wulf v. Bravo Brio Restaurant Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Garmback v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Johnson v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Blue v. Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API