Barker v. City of Kansas
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
Plaintiffs, taxpayers of the city of Kansas City and of the benefit district sought to be created, brought this action No*349vember 12, 1936, under G. S. 1935, 13-1403 and 60-1121, to enjoin the city and its officials in their attempt to exercise the power of eminent domain to establish parking areas in certain blocks of the city and to levy certain assessments upon the property of plaintiffs to pay the costs thereof. After an answer and reply had been filed defendants moved the court, pursuant to G. S. 1935, 60-2904, to try the issues of law in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Riverside Park Ass'n v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Ford v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Armourdale State Bank v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Alber v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Menlo Park v. ArtinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Barker v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Isley v. BogartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Isley v. BogartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Smith v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.