Legal Opinion

Riverside Park Ass'n v. City of Hutchinson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 9, 1918No. 21,316PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was a suit to enjoin the collection of a paving tax assessed upon plaintiff’s property. On July 6, 1915, the city of Hutchinson passed an ordinance providing for the paving of South Main street from the south line of Avenue' F to the Arkansas river. The following plat shows the portion of the street in question and the situation of the surrounding properties:

*489

*490On July 30, 1915, a contract was made for the paving, and, as first drawn up, it provided for the paving to extend to the river, but it was afterward changed (and according to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rockwell v. City of Junction CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. City of Topeka v. GageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of ChanuteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Rockwell v. City of JunctionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Arment v. City of Dodge CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Taos County Board of Education v. SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Bass v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Mason v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Mead v. Wiley Methodist Episcopal ChurchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Reti v. Vaniska, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API