Legal Opinion

Armourdale State Bank v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1930No. 29,036PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action to enjoin the city government of Kansas City from enforcing an amendment to- its general zoning ordinance which would have the effect of changing the classification of some town lots of plaintiff from one for light industrial purposes to another for residential purposes.

Plaintiff’s petition alleged that the amended ordinance was arbitrary, oppressive and illegal. A particularly alleged infirmity in the ordinance was based on the ground that the statutory prerequisites to the enactment of- a zoning ordinance or amendment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ware v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Wright v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Adler v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Spurgeon v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Florida Tallow Corporation v. BryanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Lauterbach v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Manning v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API