Legal Opinion

Barker v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1939No. 34,225PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

Plaintiffs, who are taxpayers, commenced an action against the city of Kansas City, various of its officers, and the county *697clerk and county treasurer of Wyandotte county, to enjoin the city from proceeding to condemn lands for parking stations in the city, the same to be paid for by special assessments and general tax. Issues were duly joined and the cause was tried by three judges of the district court sitting en banc, and resulted in a judgment for plaintiffs, from which the defendants appeal.

It may here be noted that in 1936 the city…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Comm'rs of Leavenworth Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Division of Howard CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  3. State ex rel. Harris v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  4. City of Topeka v. GillettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  5. Parker-Washington Co. v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. May v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. Berentz v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API