Legal Opinion

City of Menlo Park v. Artino

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1957No. Civ. 17224, 17267PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

This proceeding in eminent domain was brought by respondent, city of Menlo Park, a municipal corporation, against the appellants, who are the owners of certain lands, sought by respondent for the construction of off-street parking plazas. These consolidated appeals are taken from a judgment after a verdict fixing the amount of appellants’ damages in condemnation proceedings and from an order granting respondent immediate possession, after denial of a writ of supersedeas by this court.

A detailed statement of the facts is necessary for a proper understanding of the issues raised on appeal.

Under…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. City of Oakland v. Oakland RaidersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Mozzetti v. City of BrisbaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API