Goldstone v. Columbia Life & Trust Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
By direction of the court and on motion of respondent a verdict in favor of the company was rendered by a jury and the appeal is from a judgment entered thereon.
Plaintiff, widow of one Jaeob Goldstone, brought the action as beneficiary named in a life insurance policy issued by respondent to said Jacob Goldstone on September 26, 1913. It appears that one of the conditions of the policy was as follows: “This contract of insurance is made in consideration of the application for this policy, a copy of which is hereto attached and which application is hereby made a part of this contract. ’ ’ In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Madsen v. Maryland Cas. Co. of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Sharman v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Thompson v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Telford v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Texas State Mut. Fire Ins. v. RichbourgTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Layton v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. United National Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.