People v. United National Life Insurance
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
J. We hold in these consolidated cases that California can constitutionally regulate insurance transactions of foreign insurance companies which, although they have no agents in this state, solicit and negotiate such transactions with California residents exclusively by mail from offices outside this state. Additionally we conclude that foreign insurers engaging in such activities are subject to the provisions of section 700 of the Insurance Code 1 and, as a condition precedent to engaging therein, must procure from the Insurance Commissioner of this state (commissioner) a certificate of…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- McHugh v. Protective Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 2021
- Combs v. STP Nuclear Operating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. ManchaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.