Madsen v. Maryland Cas. Co. of Baltimore
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Myrick & Deering, and James Walter Scott, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A rehearing was granted in this case for further consideration of the principal question involved,— namely, the power of a mere soliciting agent of an insurance company to effect the waiver of a warranty exacted from the insured by the insurer, either expressly, or, as here, by him self writing the application for insurance and embodying a known false statement touching such warranty therein. Still further, a rehearing was granted because the identical question was before the court in another case, that of Sharman v. Continental Ins. Co., 167 Cal. 117, [138 Pac. 708], The decision…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Cleaver v. Traders' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Modern Woodmen v. TevisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Iverson v. Metropolitan Life Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Valdez v. Taylor Automobile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Telford v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Golden Gate Motor Transport Co. v. Great American Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.