Legal Opinion
De Luxe Game Corp. v. Wonder Products Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 26, 1957PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
In each of the above cases, the defendant, Wonder Products Company, a Tennessee corporation, has made identical motions upon the same grounds.
On August 21, 1957, the defendant appeared herein “specially and solely for the limited purpose of contesting the service of summons, and the jurisdiction and venue of this Court.” The defendant has made the following motions:
1. To quash the return of service of process on the grounds (a) that the defendant has not been properly served with the summons because the person upon whom service was made “is not an agent, servant,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Lone Star Package Car Co., Inc. v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Latimer v. S/A Industrias Reunidas F. MatarazzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Japan Gas Lighter Association v. Ronson Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
- De Luxe Game Corp. v. Wonder Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Koratron Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Kamen Soap Products Co. v. STRUTHERS WELLS CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Proler Steel Corp. v. Luria Brothers & Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.