Legal Opinion
Koratron Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc., a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1969No. 23169PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Pursuant to leave granted by this court (28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)), appellant Deering Milliken, Inc. (“Milliken”), appeals from an interlocutory order of the District Court for the Northern District of California denying Milliken’s motions to dismiss, to transfer, or to stay the action filed against it by Koratron Company, Inc. (“Koratron”).
Milliken contends that venue was improperly laid because the gravamen of Koratron’s action is patent infringement for which an action may be brought only “in the judicial district where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- G.S. Rasmussen & Associates, Inc. v. Kalitta Flying Service, Inc. Connie Kalitta Services, Inc. Conrad A. KalittaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Geni-Chlor International, Inc., a Corporation v. Multisonics Development Corp., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Stark v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Application of State of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.