Legal Opinion
Sharemaster v. U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 2, 2017No. 13-73199PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH
OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
Securities Exchange Act Section 19(d)(2) authorizes the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) to review any “final disciplinary sanction” imposed by a registered securities industry self-regulatory organization, including the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). 15 U.S.C. § 78s(d)(2). This case *1062requires us to decide whether the Commission’s review authority ■ under Section 19(d)(2) is limited to final disciplinary sanctions that remain “live.” The Commission interpreted Section…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Lattanzio v. ComtaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Auto Ind. Pension Trust Fund v. Toshiba Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- (PS) Atlas Lifting & Rigging, LLC v. BernerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Adom v. California Department of Corrections and RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. MartenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
- Bowers v. Denali State BankDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.