Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Candace Fox v. Deborah Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 8, 2016No. 13-56704Published

1ConcurrenceHurwitz, Circuit Judge

Candace Fox committed a gruesome and senseless crime. She was ultimately convicted of first-degree murder, and does not argue in this § 2254 proceeding that she did not receive a fair trial.

Nonetheless, as both Judge Smith and Judge Reinhardt note, this is a troubling case. Fox originally pleaded guilty to second-degree murder in exchange for her testimony against a co-defendant. She held up her end of the bargain, testifying for five hours in a preliminary hearing. Yet both that co-defendant ahd another received lesser sentences than the one Fox is now serving. Moreover, the record of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API