Harrington v. Richter
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
The writ of habeas corpus stands as a safeguard against imprisonment of those held in violation of the law. Judges must be vigilant and independent in reviewing petitions for the writ, a commitment that entails substantial judicial resources. Those resources are diminished and misspent, however, and confidence in the writ and the law it vindicates *92undermined, if there is judicial disregard for the sound and established principles that inform its proper issuance. That judicial disregard is inherent in the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit here under review. The Court of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11,922 opinions
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Burt v. TitlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Wilson v. SellersSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
11,917 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.