Legal Opinion

Persik v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 9, 1989No. 23PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The sole issue in this appeal is whether a person who is unemployed when a vehicular accident occurs may assert a claim under the income loss benefit provision of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL).1 The trial court held that an unemployed person cannot recover lost income and entered summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurance company. We reverse. An injured person ma> recover income loss benefit by showing that “but for” the accident, he or she would have worked and earned income.

On July 20, 1985, Julia C. Persik, while operating an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Weiss v. Keystone MacK Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Freeze v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Fulmer v. Com., Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Panichelli v. Liberty Mutual Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Huber v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Curbee, Ltd. v. RhubartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API