Legal Opinion
Lemus v. Potter
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 1, 2021No. A167142PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
201 Argued and submitted October 1, 2019, affirmed September 1, 2021 Maria LEMUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary POTTER, aka Matthew Donald Potter, Defendant-Respondent. Washington County Circuit Court 16CV40991; A167142
498 P3d 1
In this negligence action, plaintiff sued “Gary Potter aka Matthew Donald Potter” to recover damages resulting from an automobile accident. Before trial, and after the applicable statute of limitations period had expired, plaintiff moved to amend her complaint to substitute Gary’s son, Matthew Donald Potter, as defendant. The trial court denied that motion primarily…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Herman v. Valley InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Mitchell v. the TimbersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Harmon v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Richlick v. Relco Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jared Lee Hawkins v. Wellpath Liquidating Trust; Jane Doe; and Kelly DoeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- Roe v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024