Legal Opinion
Harmon v. Meyer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 12, 1997No. 9503-01540, CA A90654PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s ORCP 67 B judgment dismissing claims against The Interlake Companies, Inc., (defendant) 1 in this personal injury action in which plaintiff seeks damages under common-law negligence and the Employer Liability Law. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the claims on the ground that the action had not been timely commenced as to defendant. We conclude that the action was timely commenced and therefore reverse the judgment of dismissal.
Plaintiff was injured on March 8, 1993. A two-year statute of limitations is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shelton v. ParisOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Ross v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Herman v. Valley InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Richlick v. Relco Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Johnson v. MandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Simon v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Mitchell v. the TimbersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Worthington v. Estate of DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Kowalski v. Hereford L'OasisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Krauel v. Dykers Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.