Legal Opinion

Roe v. City of Portland

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 19, 2024No. 3:22-cv-01193Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RICHARD ROE, Case No. 3:22-cv-01193-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. CITY OF PORTLAND, AMELIA FLOHR, JOHN DOES I-V, Defendants. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Richard Roe (“Roe”) filed this action against the City of Portland (“City”), Amelia Flohr (“Flohr”), and John Does I through V (“Doe Defendants”) (together, “Defendants”), alleging constitutional violations pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(“Section 1983”). Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. (ECF No. 48.) The Court has…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API