Roe v. City of Portland
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RICHARD ROE, Case No. 3:22-cv-01193-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. CITY OF PORTLAND, AMELIA FLOHR, JOHN DOES I-V, Defendants. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Richard Roe (“Roe”) filed this action against the City of Portland (“City”), Amelia Flohr (“Flohr”), and John Does I through V (“Doe Defendants”) (together, “Defendants”), alleging constitutional violations pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983
(“Section 1983”). Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. (ECF No. 48.) The Court has…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.