Legal Opinion

Richlick v. Relco Equipment, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 12, 1993No. 9009-05759; CA A72889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his negligence action after the trial court’s entry of summary judgment for defendant on the ground that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.

Plaintiff was injured on September 22, 1988, when the brake handle on the locomotive that he was operating broke, and the locomotive crashed into other railroad cars. Defendant, Releo Locomotives, Inc., owned and maintained the locomotive and rented it to plaintiffs employer, Columbia Grain Company, of Portland.

Columbia’s lease of the locomotive is with “Releo Equipment, Inc.,” although, by that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Johnson v. MacGregorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Herman v. Valley InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Harmon v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Mitchell v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Hamilton v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Kowalski v. Hereford L'OasisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API