Herman v. Valley Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendant Valley Insurance Company (Valley). ORS 19.010. The trial court ruled that the suit limitation provision in plaintiffs homeowner’s insurance policy with Valley barred her suit against it. We affirm.
We view the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the nonmoving party. ORCP 47 C; Jones v. General Motors Corp., 139 Or App 244, 911 P2d 1243, rev allowed 323 Or 483 (1996). Plaintiff purchased a homeowner’s insurance policy from Valley. ORS 742.240 requires such policies 1 to contain the following suit limitation provision or its…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Zuckerman v. Transamerica InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Paulson v. Western Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Waxman v. Waxman & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Richardson v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Mitchell v. the TimbersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Harmon v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Brockway v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.