Legal Opinion

Granger v. Darling

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1909No. Docket No. 108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Gage (William G.), J. Case by Annie E. Granger against Harry Darling for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff was calling at the house of the defendant on business. As she was upon the steps leading into the house, she was attacked and bitten by a dog, claimed to be the defendant’s. She brought suit against him and recovered a judgment for $500. Three errors are assigned.

1. The court instructed the jury as follows:

“And I will say right now that in every case, in determining the weight to be given to the testimony of the witnesses, if you are satisfied that any witness has testified falsely with regard to any material fact in the case, then you have a right to reject the testimony of that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louden v. SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Cole v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Richards v. TozerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Fraser v. HaggertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Whitaker v. EngleMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fishleigh v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Goldberg v. Cities Service Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Smith v. MatickaMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Bosek v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API