Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Smith v. Maticka

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1943No. Docket No. 20, Calendar No. 42,136PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.

This controversy arises out of an automobile accident occurring in the forenoon of June 15, 1940, involving an Oldsmobile automobile driven by Thomas Maticka, Jr., the son of defend ant Thomas Maticka, doing business as' Sanford Lumber Company, and a Ford pickup truck owned and operated by plaintiff. The defendant, Lloyd Mahar, is an automobile dealer from whom the Oldsmobile car had been purchased by defendant Maticka. However, at the time of the accident, title to said vehicle had not been transferred in pursuance of the sale and, therefore, Mahar is a party defendant hereto.

According to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Donker v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Anderson v. LynchMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Garton v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. In Re Orr's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Quick v. Western Michigan Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wells v. Flint Trolley Coach, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Craddock v. Torrence Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Ruotsala v. HolzhauerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Decker v. WoffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Wilson v. PhillipsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API