Legal Opinion

Fraser v. Haggerty

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hogmer, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

Plaintiffs, as copartners, sued defendant in asstmpsit for legal services alleged to have been performed by Mr. Gates for defendant.- The jury found for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.

Defendant was a party to two suits' pending on the chancery side of the Wayne circuit court, in which Sylvester Larned was her solicitor of ■ record. Mr. Gates claimed that defendant came to his office, November 26, 1886, and told him that she had a suit coming on in the circuit court, in which Col. Larned was her solicitor, and that he was out of the city; that she offered him $30 to assist Col. Larned to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Rankin v. WestMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. People ex rel. Springett v. ColerickMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Argabright v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. BreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Granger v. DarlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API