Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Engle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne; Lil'libridge, J. Assumpsit by William Whitaker against Seth E. Engle for a commission on an exchange of real estate. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This suit involves the right of the plaintiff to recover the commission on an exchange of real estate which plaintiff claims he effected between the defendant and a third party. He recovered a verdict of $333.41. The claims of the respective parties, as submitted by the court to the jury, are as follows:

“Plaintiff claims that defendant entered into an agreement to pay him 2 per cent, for commission for selling or exchanging his property on Lincoln avenue, in this city, for some other property; that defendant asked him what commission he would charge for the sale of this property; that he…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Yoder v. Randol NixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Meagher v. ReeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  3. Cain v. MasuretteMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Fuday v. GillMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Granger v. DarlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API