Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gensler v. Nicholas

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1908No. Docket No. 114PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Clinton; Dodds, J., presiding. Summary proceedings by Mary Gensler against George Nicholas for the possession of certain real estate. There was judgment for complainant, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action was brought to recover possession of land under section 11165, 3 Comp. Laws. The complaint averred the following:

“That George Nicholas is in possession of the following described lands and tenements, situated in the township of Ovid, in said county of Clinton and State of Michigan, to wit: The south half (i) of the northwest quarter (i) of the southwest one-quarter (i) of section twenty-eight (28), township seven (7) north, range one (1) west.
“ That said Mary Gensler, the complainant herein, is the owner of a life estate in and landlady of said premises, and said George Nicholas,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Delashman v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Pratt v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Heilbron v. HeinlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Mann v. SchroerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  5. Bryan v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. NoonanWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Fowler v. McQuiggMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Winston-Salem Masonic Temple Co. v. Union Guano Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Whitener v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Enyart v. EnyartMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API