Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Davis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1895PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The relator commenced suit by summons against Allan McComber and John J. Bale, on the 7th of June, 1893, and subsequently filed a declaration alleging that an injury resulted to plaintiff while in the employ of the defendants, by reason of the failure of the defendants to provide plaintiff a safe place to work. The declaration set out the facts relied upon at considerable length, but was thought by plaintiff’s attorneys to be faulty, and an application was made to amend by inserting an averment, as follows:

“And the plaintiff alleges that, in thie performance of all the matters aforesaid, he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Gorman v. Judge of the Newaygo Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Ripley v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Pangborn v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wood v. LaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Baker v. PiersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Co. v. HealdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Coates v. Milner Hotels, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Cahill v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Smalley v. Northwestern Terra-Cotta Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Chobanian v. Washburn Wire CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API