Legal Opinion

Winston-Salem Masonic Temple Co. v. Union Guano Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 26, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendant from GooTce, J., at February Term, 1913, of FORSYTH.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

Tbis is an action for tbe recovery of rent. Tbe parties, on 1 April, 1908, entered into an agreement by which plaintiff leased to tbe defendant tbe first floor of its building for “office purposes,” with' tbis provision; “for a term of six months from tbe 1st day of April, 1908, to tbe 1st day of October, 1908. It is further mutually agreed that the said Union Guano Company may have the privilege of continuing this lease for a term of four years on the same terms and conditions. The first of said monthly installments of $95.83% is to become -payable to the authorized collector of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Delashman v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Hornthal v. . HowcottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Montgomery v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Kimball v. CrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. Murrell v. LionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. FrazelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Seattle v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Glenn v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Alchemy Communications Corp. v. Preston Development Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Gates v. Hutchinson Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API