Legal Opinion

McDuffie v. Noonan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1934No. 24750. Department OnePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— This action was one in unlawful detainer, brought for the purpose of obtaining possession of two lots in the city of Tacoma. In the action as originally brought, one H. J. Noonan was named as the only defendant. Subsequently, John W. Peak intervened. To the amended complaint in intervention, a demurrer was interposed and sustained, and, the intervener not having pleaded further within the time specified by the court, the complaint in intervention was dismissed. A demurrer was also interposed to the affirmative defense in Noonan’s amended answer to the' complaint, and this was likewise…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baranov v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Shannon v. GrindstaffWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Kimball v. CottingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Sheridan v. O. E. Doherty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Lamson v. CoulsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brickum Investment Co. v. Vernham Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  2. Morrison v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Bernier v. BensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  4. Groth v. Continental Oil CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  5. OTR v. Flakey Jake's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API