Heilbron v. Heinlen
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order refusing a new trial. -The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
— This is an action to recover possession of a tract of land in Fresno County, which is alleged to be a part of the rancho Laguna de Tache, and is described as “ that portion of the northwest quarter of section 36, township 18 south, range 19 east, which lies north of Kings River.”
The complaint is in the usual form for actions of ejectment. The answer denies the plaintiffs’ seisin or right to the possession of the land, and sets up the statute of limitations.
The case was tried by a jury, and the verdict and judgment were in favor of plaintiffs. The defendants moved *377for a new…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sharp v. BlankenshipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Johnson v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by16 opinions
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Mitchell v. TowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Taylor v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Cullinan v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.