Legal Opinion

Baier v. State Farm Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 9, 1975No. 58174PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dbucker

Plaintiff, an attorney, brought this class action on his own behalf and on behalf of all persons similarly situated against defendants, State Farm and Allstate Insurance Companies. He is seeking to recover reasonable attorney’s fees which were denied him by defendants after he had allegedly obtained a recovery for State Farm on its subrogated medical payments claim. Defendants filed motions for summary judgment based on the pleadings and plaintiff’s deposition, and after a hearing the court entered summary judgments against plaintiff. Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration, supported by…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Allen v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. United Services Automobile Association v. HillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. PothsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. General Exchange Insurance v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Applicolor, Inc. v. Surface Combustion Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Kimbrough v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Baier v. State Farm Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Perlman v. Time, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Chisolm v. StephensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Newell v. Field Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API